Americans United for the Separation of Church and State vs Changed lives
Thursday, November 3rd, 2005Check out this recent news story:
Charles Colson’s Christian-based prison project on trial in Iowa
What’s more important - the letter of the law or the spirit of the law? While Barry Lynn and others zealously pursue this as a matter of law, Prison Fellowship sees it as a matter of changing lives.
Prison Fellowship President Mark Earley was asked why departments of corrections have been eager to invite the InnerChange Freedom Initiative (IFI) program into their prisons…
They have been eager to invite IFI into their prisons because of a demonstrated ability of our program to reduce the recidivism rate. A study released in Texas in February shows that during the six years IFI has operated at the Carol Vance Unit in Texas, the recidivism rate for those who have gone through the entire program is 8 percent, compared with 22 percent for general-population inmates who were eligible for the program but did not participate - a reduction of two-thirds! Officials also appreciate the program because the changes in the lives of IFI inmates also effect a change in the broader prison population in a very positive way. And they appreciate a healthier climate of moral values and relationships among the inmates that the IFI program produces.
—
IFI is confronting its first - and so far only - legal challenge, as Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed suit against the Iowa program in February. Executive director Barry Lynn attacks IFI as an unconstitutional establishment of religion, although prisoners volunteer to participate with the understanding that all content is based on a biblical perspective.
Despite this challenge, the InnerChange Freedom Initiative has gained a growing respect since a publicized University of Pennsylvania study found that 92 percent of the Texas program’s graduates stayed out of prison. It’s been over three years I have been free, said IFI graduate Ruben. I will always acknowledge it was the IFI program, through God’s Word, which turned me into a new man. . . . There is nothing more powerful than God’s Word.
Which would we rather see - changed prisoners or the forcing of Prison Fellowship to leave with prisoners not being changed as a result? That’s the issue…and it’s not unlike Jesus healing on the sabbath is it? While nobody in the Americans United for Separation of Church group would say they are against changing prisoners lives for the better, how is that not the result of their stance? In the big picture, who wins and who loses as a result? We must remember that.
Related Links:
Legal Attack on the InnerChange Freedom Initiative










