Archive for March 24th, 2004

The upcoming Presidential election

Wednesday, March 24th, 2004

The upcoming Presidential election…

…will not be nearly as much about the war against terrorism or tax cuts as it will be a referendum on the importance of faith in our country.

Case in point…a recent article from the very left-leaning magazine The Nation

Many of these same political activists turned up in November to celebrate President Bush’s signing of the “partial birth” abortion ban. About this happy moment, Jerry Falwell, in a burst of characteristic hogwash, wrote:

After having a wonderful time of fellowship with President Bush, the president asked if we could all join hands and pray that God will bless our efforts to preserve life in our land. What an astounding moment this was for me personally. Standing there in the Oval Office I felt suddenly humbled to be in the presence of a man–our president–who takes his faith very seriously and who seeks the prayers of his friends as he leads our nation. Following the prayer, I told President Bush the people in the room represent about 200,000 pastors and 80 million believers nationwide, who consider him not only to be our president but also a man of God. He humbly turned to me and replied, “I’ll try to live up to it.”

The bold calculation of electoral power, the canny conflation of a sectarian agenda with divisive presidential politics, the syrup of piety poured over both–this is Bush’s America, a country where fundamentalism thrives in the chaos of non-meaning in secular public space. Richard Land has said, “We’re in this for the long haul, and the people on the other side had best understand…we’re winning.” I’m not sure about that, but to prove him wrong we have to be sure we say what we mean, and mean what we say–on the campaign trail, in Congress and in our courts.

It’s hard to follow all of this thanks to the nonsensical wordiness of the writing (with alliteration thrown in at no charge!) but it’s not hard to follow the deeply secular, anti-Christian tone of it.

Atheist Calls Pledge Unconstitutional

Wednesday, March 24th, 2004

Atheist Calls Pledge Unconstitutional

>If the rest of the court agrees with Newdow now, it could declare that the phrase “under God” breaches the figurative wall separating church and state. That would mean an end to the Pledge of Allegiance as generations of American schoolchildren have known it.

What this is really about is an attempt by some to remove themselves from any accountability to God, but of course just removing any reminders or denying the truth will not absolve us. Truth is still true even if no one believes it.

Chuck Colson recently stated that removing ‘under God’ from the pledge ‘presumably leaves us as one nation under nothing.’

He goes on to say….

“We declare ourselves free from any moral
law or governor higher than the imperial self, and so we become gods.

Isn’t that descriptive? It sounds like Satan and his desires as recorded in the book of Isaiah…

“I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

It’s ironic that atheists that claim to be “their own person” and not needing “the crutch of religion” are actually doing just the opposite. They are walking the way of the world as influenced by the ruler of this world, the road most taken.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.