Bush Signs Fetus Rights Legislation
Wednesday, March 31st, 2004Bush Signs Fetus Rights Legislation
President Bush signed legislation today that makes it a crime to harm a fetus during an assault on a pregnant woman.
The bill passed by a 245-163 vote in the House and by a 61-38 margin in the Senate.
What is the reasoning behind the 163 House and 38 Senate votes against this? Those that did not vote for it will probably say that it would lead to a chipping away of the abortion rights in this country. What does that say about abortion when a bill of this sort can’t be agreed to because of the moral conflict with abortion rights?
Here is a quote today from Kate Michelman, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America (formerly The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League)…
“Everyone agrees on the need to protect pregnant women and the developing lives within them from harm – and with just a few phone calls, the President could have persuaded Congress to pass a consensus bill doing so without entangling it in the abortion rights issue.”
If everyone agrees, why didn’t everyone agree to this legislation? There is no way to address issues of this sort without running smack dab into the moral question of abortion and it’s consequences.
Note: She even mentions “developing lives” in the previous quote. So the logical conclusion is that an abortion ends a developing life. But she didn’t say that, she said that everyone agrees we need to protect the developing lives from harm. How is abortion not harmful? We are only denying reality when we say that it is a choice and not a harmful act to the developing life inside and a harmful act spiritually to the woman.








